The
text by David Wang presents many strategies for research in the design process
and offers many examples to back up his claims. He starts his arguments by
establishing the prevalent perception most architects share, that design and
research are two distinctly different processes. He then argues that although
they are separate activities, research can aid in the design process. This is
an idea supported in the Design as
Research text. In that article Hinson discusses the movement in some
schools of architecture towards a design/build model of architectural learning
and exploration. This model embraces research as the foundation to the design
process.
Hinson
argues that while research can on it’s own merits be considered scholarly,
design can also be considered scholarly if it meets certain requirements. He
supports his arguments with two examples from Auburn University’s School of
Architecture. These design/build studios would most likely fall into the Design
and Experimental Research method discussed by Wang in his text. That is one of
seven different methods he explains about approaching research in architectural
exploration.
I
found the Hinson article to be much more to the point and succinct, while the
Wang paper was much more dense and said too much about the exact same things.
Wang uses many words to describe primarily the same info, but sighting new
sources along the way. Hinson poses his arguments and backs them up with a few
sources that resonate better than the many delivered by Wang. Over all I found
both articles to be informative, but I had a better connection with Design as Research because of the easy
way the information was presented.
No comments:
Post a Comment